A name can be described as "a word or set of words by which a person or an object is known, addressed, or referred to". However, it is so much more than just that.  A name gives associations, meaning and flavour to a person, an object or a brand. It reminds of experiences and it will quickly give you certain emotions and connotations such as a good, bad or neutral gut feeling.

So what’ is in a name? Actually, a lot, much more than you can imagine. Choosing a name for your company carefully is therefore one of the most important decisions you will make, especially for a start-up. 

Choosing a name can be a tricky thing if you don't know the relevant techniques. When you know the methods of developing a brand name it will be much easier for you to pick the right name for your company, one that makes you stand out from the crowd.  To inspire you, let's explore some popular name techniques and examples of how world famous brands got their names.

1. Descriptive: A name that says what the company/brand does. Usually the company uses two different words to create one brand name.

China Mobile is a Chinese state owned telecommunications company that provides nationwide telecoms services.
Other examples: Hoover, General Electric and Whole Foods.

2. Coined/Invented: Playful or poetically constructed names that are based on rhythm and the experience of saying them. It sounds like a word but have no dictionary meaning.

Google The name Google is a play on the word “googol” which is a mathematical term for the number represented by the numeral 1 followed by 100 zeros. This reflects the founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brins, mission to organize infinite amount of information on the web.
Other examples: Yahoo, Bing and Accenture

3. Acronym: An abbreviation formed from the initial letters of other words and pronounced as a word.

IKEA is inspired by the founder’s initials “ Ingvar Kamprad”, the first letter of his family farm “Elmtaryd” and his birthplace “Agunnaryd”.
Other examples: IBM, BMW and SAP

4. Evocative:  Evocative brand names say nothing about what you do. Instead they evoke the positioning of a company or product through an unexpected, yet relevant hint or perception.

Victoria’s Secret. The company was founded by Roy Raymond based on the insight hat most men felt embarrassed when buying lingerie for their women. He set up a shop in Palo Alto in 1977 where men were suppose to feel comfortable in an American vision of an English boudoir. The brand was called Victoria’s Secret after Queen Victoria, who was the regent during a very repressed era in time. The name suggested a veil of respectability pulled over “secrets” hidden underneath. However, in marketing only to men, Raymond forgot that most of a women’s underwear is purchased by the women themselves. A new owner took over and in the 1990s the marketing and stores changed to have more appeal for women, leading to today’s success.
Other examples: Virgin Airlines, Innocent Smoothies and Tropicana

5. Founders name/merged: Simply a name that consists of the founders names.

Mercedes-Benz.  Karl Benz was a German innovator and founder of the motor company Benz & Cie in 1883. Benz largest rival was Daimler, another German motor company, founded by Gottlieb Daimler.  One of Daimler’s business partners was Austrian investor Emil Jellinek who had a passion for motor sport. Jellinek was promoting, selling and racing in Daimler cars under the pseudonym “Mercedes”. Mercedes was the Spanish name of his young daughter, meaning, “grace”. Jellinek's racing success in the important Nice Week in 1901 led to an agreement with Daimler that gave name to a new innovative engine called Daimler-Mercedes.  In 1926, Benz and Daimler merged and formed a new company called Daimler-Benz AG where a joint trademark was created - the famous three-pointed star – which still adorns Mercedes-Benz vehicles.
Other examples: Adidas, Johnson & Johnson and Ericsson.

6) Real words: Names that are re-purposed words and work through a metaphor or indirect association. Such names cannot be generically descriptive as they wouldn’t be protectable trademarks. Can be difficult and expensive to trademark.

Apple: The name came from a driving conversation between the founders, Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. Steve Jobs was coming back from a visit to an “apple orchard” and suggested a name for their company – Apple Computer. They both tried to come up with technical-sounding names that were better, but couldn’t think of any good ones. Apple was so much better and that became the brand.
Other examples: Orange, Fox and Amazon.

7) Compound:  A name that is a hybrid, formed from two existing words, often with the first word receiving the main emphasis in pronunciation. An easy way to create new words with limitless number of possible combinations.

YouTube: The history of YouTube began in 2005 when the founders activated the Internet domain name "YouTube.com" and started to create a video-sharing website on which users could upload, share, and view videos.
Other examples: Band Aid, LinkedIn, Face Book and Firefox.

Naming process
With the above naming techniques in mind you can now start to create a name for your company.  At Lavandel, we recommend using the following process:

1) Start by writing a brief with criteria’s and considerations for the new name. Use your vision, brand strategy and the market your company is operating within.

2) Conduct a creative name brainstorming consisting of key people who thoroughly understand your brand and vision. If you have a brand platform already, use it as a starting point as it should be aligned with the new name.

3) Define themes that are appropriate for your brand, based on your brand values and brand essence. Explore the different types and techniques of names (common are descriptive, evocative, coined/invented, compounds, associations, experiential, acronyms and merged/ founders name). All of those types can be included in your brainstorming as long as it supports your brand objectives.

4) Evaluate the names. To find a winning name you need to ask yourself the following questions:
·      Is it distinctive and unique? Connected to your brand essence? Does it differentiate you from            other companies in the market?
·      Is it memorable?
·      Does it inspire your target audience? Is it simple and clear with positive connotations?
·      Is it easy to spell and pronounce? How does it sound? Is it short and concise?
·      Does it give appropriate associations? Does it mean something else in another language? Is it           culturally neutral in a global context?
·      Does it have legs and longevity? Can it grow with your brand and be used for sub-brands?
·      Can it be protected?

5) Choose a name that can tell a story behind your company.  The story can expand over time and enable your brand to stand out in the crowd.

6) When you have decided for a name it is necessary to trademark it in all current or future markets where you will operate. You also need to consider all digital channels where you need to own your name.

7) Time to launch and implement your new name across all channels. Be sure to have a plan for managing your brand long-term as this will be one of your key investments for future success.

Image sources: Apple, Mercedes-Benz, Victoria's Sectret, IKEA, China Mobile, YouTube

A brand is more than a logo.
You have probably heard that statement before and it still holds true. A brand is defined by many intangible and tangible factors that together create an impression in the mind of a person. Intangible factors are the brand promise, expectations, experiences, perceptions and brand personality. Tangible factors are marketing, packaging, retail and of course the visual identity.

When creating a visual identity there are some basic elements that build the foundation for a brand: logotype, symbol, typeface, colours, grid and photography style. Nevertheless, the main recognizing and brand building element is often the logo.

On the other hand, what would be the impact if we exclude the logo? Are there any other visual elements that can contribute to creating a recognizable and unique brand? The answer is yes.

Below are some examples of successful brands who have differentiated themselves through the use of distinct visual cues other than the logo. By using any of these techniques you can increase the possibility to create a unique brand that customers immediately identify as yours.

Colour
The colour of your brand can be a very strong cue in differentiating your brand. A unique colour or colour combination can ensure your brand to stand out in your category or even in the entire market place.

Pattern
A unique pattern can be a strong signal for a brand to be immediately recognizable. It can be applied on different products and advanced into a family of similar design patterns, endowing the creation of a heritage brand.

Form
An iconic form will help customers to recognize your products  immediately, despite the absence of a logo. Brands within the consumer goods industry have been particularly successful in creating distinctive forms, allowing their products to stand out on crowded shelves.

Packaging
A unique, quirky and clever packaging will not only differentiate your product from the rest, it will make it more attractive and can even put a smile on your customer. First impression last and creative design can make a significant difference.

It is easy to believe that the logo is the central element in a brand's visual identity. The fact is that a brand consists of many components that works together to create the brand impression. Successful brands can be characterized through their ability to utilize key elements, such as visual cues, that make them unique and enable them to stand out against their competition.

Let us know if you want your brand to be more than a logo.

Image sources: Lorien, Flickr, Webdesign, Iloveprints, Missoni, agentofstyle, Paul Smith, freecodesource, Burberry, Salon of the dames, Heinz History, The inspiration room, advertolog, Toxel, Behance, Corinne Pant, AH & OH, Hiroko Sanders, BQB

Yahoo has recently unveiled their new logo after a 30-day campaign during which a variation of the logo was presented each day on the company web site, then the final candidate was launched.

The new logo has been designed by CEO Marissa Mayer and a team of internal designers during one weekend in summer. The background due to Mayer:  “We knew we wanted a logo that reflected Yahoo – whimsical, yet sophisticated.  Modern and fresh, with a nod to our history.  Having a human touch, personal.  Proud.”

OLD LOGO

NEW LOGO

The revamp is the first major identity change in Yahoo’s 18-year history and this could have been a great opportunity to signal a positive change for the company. Instead the designers have left more or less all major elements of the logo intact except for the font where the elaboration has been focused. Unfortunately the new logo does not really fit Mayers brief as it feels more engineered, structured and boring than fresh and modern. More business-like than whimsical and personal. The new font also makes it look more like a brand in the beauty sector than a proud internet brand. Out of the 30-day campaign I believe there were several options that suited the brief better than the final one.

The feedback from the public has so far been mainly negative where a majority prefers the old logo. That can be due to the fact that most customers don’t like changes. However, don't forget the disastrous feedback that GAP, Tropicana and British Airways faced from their customers when conducting big rebranding projects. This lead them to change back their identities causing big costs and embarrassment.

Branding is an important strategic discipline and a rebranding is a big operation for any brand. A new logo should be a core element of a professionally planned brand launch consisting of a new brand strategy, new vision, new brand positioning, new customer promise etc. Yahoo should therefore have focused their efforts on defining a strong brand foundation including the elements just mentioned, then using good creative design to conceptualize the brand strategy into a visual identity where the logo is a main expression. Just re-designing the old logo makes this look more like a cosmetic overhaul than a much needed signal of strategic brand change.

In the highly competitive arena where Yahoo is playing, they need to be able to tell customers why they should choose Yahoo and what makes Yahoo different.
A "new" logo is not enough.